I’ve been on vacation for the past week, so I wasn’t assigned any stories related to the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
I admit I didn’t mind at all … it’s tough with these types of stories to say anything new, different or profound. It’s a real challenge for journalists of all stripes: writers, photographers, columnists, designers.
Since I was out of the loop, I didn’ t know what my newspaper’s front page would look like. I really liked what the paper did. Almost all of A1 today is a huge night photo of the blue beams rising from the World Trade Center site, with the Statue of Liberty visible in the foreground. It’s a striking image.
The headline is “Remembering 9/11” and there are just a few paragraphs of text over the image. At the bottom of the page are blurbs highlighting all of the 9/11 stories inside the paper.
In a way, I think the front page acknowledges that it’s difficult to sum up in words what we feel and think today, 10 years after the attacks. It is a testament to the power of a photo to capture emotions with no words.
I like it.
I browsed through the Newseum’s gallery of front pages to see how other newspapers handled today. (This is a fun thing to do on any day, really.)
Many chose a similar route as my newspaper, with A1 devoted entirely to 9/11 with huge photo and very little text. Some chose the same photo my paper did.
Other newspapers covered A1 with all 9/11-related stories and photos, but with a more traditional look — a big centerpiece with striking art and smaller stories and headlines around it.
Still others used 9/11 as a centerpiece, but mixed in non-9/11 news stories around it.
I imagine there were challenging discussions in newsrooms around the country about how to play the 10th anniversary of 9/11 and how much real estate on 9/11 should be devoted to it.
I liked some front pages better than others, but all of the ones I looked at definitely showed the importance and solemnity of the event. I hope editors aren’t raked over the coals too much for having too much 9/11 coverage, or not enough. (You can’t win in this business!)
On a related note, I thought I’d jot down my 9/11 story because, well, everyone else is.
I was a reporter at the Maryland Gazette, a little more than a year out of college. The Gaz publishes on Wednesday and Saturday mornings, so Tuesday was a deadline day for us.
It was a beautiful morning and as we went about things, somehow — I don’t remember how — we heard about the first plane striking the World Trade Center tower.
I remember our small staff crowded into the office of our editor, Bob Mosier, to listen to the radio to hear what was going on.
I admit, I was dismissive of it at first. I figured it was some yahoo in a small plane who made a mistake. I was busy looking through piles of recent papers for something. (Again, I don’t remember what I was looking for.)
Eventually, I, along with everyone else, realized this was a big deal. At some point — probably after the second plane hit, or after airplanes were grounded? — Bob ordered us all out to cover the story.
I was sent to BWI Airport. Photographer Paul W. Gillespie — who was either off or on a late shift that day — was called in. He picked me up outside of the Gaz building and we sped over to the airport.
It was the first of many times in my career where I was heading toward a place that most people were trying to leave.
I remember most people streaming out of the airport trying in vain to get through to loved ones on their cell phones. I was eerily reminded of that a couple weeks ago during our little Mid-Atlantic earthquake, and I was at the Annapolis Towne Centre, where people had fled buildings and were failing to get through on their cell phones. (Not much has changed in 10 years, huh?)
Back to 2001, I remember a little bit walking around inside the airport. I don’t remember interviewing people at all, although I must have. And I don’t remember what I did all afternoon, although I must have been interviewing and writing all day.
It’s kind of a blur.